- Obtenir le lien
- X
- Autres applications
African Holocaust Society
A critical study of African Culture, History so support
- 43 membres
- 434 publications
- $40.76/mois
Choisissez un abonnement
Access to our website www.africanholocaust.net
- General Support
- Access to our website
At this level you can ask us direct questions with regard to the content on our site and get detailed researched answers. In addition access to exclusive video footage.
- General Support
- Ad-free videos
- Exclusive content
- Video tutorials & lessons
- Access to our website
- Live chat
For those of you who can afford and really want to pick up the slack caused by non-support, this tier is for you. At this level, you are a true member of the AHS team and your contributions will directly go to paying for our website www.africanholocaust.net and other direct cost domains, etc. You will be able to request articles and content and ask us to do research for you within our area of interest.
- Exclusive content
- Behind-the-scenes content
- Video tutorials & lessons
- General Support
- Ad-free videos
- General Support
- Digital ebook or publication
- Live chat
- Access to our website
Produits mis en avant
34:48
1:46:14
2:02:04
Publications récentes partagées par African Holocaust Society
There is a channel on YouTube where a guy recreates European recipes from Roman and Viking times. Dishes that Napoleon would have eaten. That is it. He cooks the dish based on historical recipes and that is it. That is his entire career. He makes $60,000 a month from Patreon and YouTube revenue. That is how serious his audience is just to learn what Tsars of Russia ate in the Winter.
We make $40 a month for work you will find nowhere else. So how much is hosting? How much are the domain names?
It explains why White is always going to have us beaten. There is more history on what Ceasar ate during his campaign in Germania than the entire history of Angola pre-European contact. We as a people are in this situation because we have NO VALUE.
AHS is not Grio, it is not Black Kings and Queens in India. It is something unique. And non-support sends us a crystal clear message. How do we feel about making this investment to level Africa up with the rest of the world and seeing the tiny money decrease month to month? While someone just discussing ancient dishes can put their kids through university and have an entire business around European history.
So our main website had to be gatewayed because of this, and now the Patreon is not working. The website is frozen, and no more work is likely to happen. All the domains Arabslavetrade, African marriage, Africankingdoms are gone. Our people are not interested! And it takes two hands to clap. We heard you! not interested. Then that is fine.
For most of the history of the Diaspora, we did not know anything about ourselves. We certainly knew nothing about Africa (our Motherland ). And that is for obvious reasons. But then the 60s and 70s came and we started to get access to what Whites had written about us. And some of us are still confused on this. You can find the most radical of black books and go and check their sources-- 85%- 95% European and Arab sources.
Then in the 80s we had another massive revision of how we looked at information (the very same information) and we had stuff like Afrocentrism coming out. Which honestly was not really new history, but how we positioned ourselves in history (from within an African-centered framework). Now I don't think it did that, all it was was Eurocentrism in blackface. They claimed stuff, and now we will claim stuff. Hardly new optics on Africa. Because it is still a racially loaded history. And history with an agenda is not really history, but politics.
But since the time of NOI and Elijah teaching us to love ourselves, we have had another massive movement in an understanding of self. a more silent progressive understanding. No longer as burdened with the worry of feeling belonging we could explore Africa beyond any taboo. The taboo of a dark continent as well as the taboo of "Kings and Queens in Africa".
I do get worried when someone makes reference to Dr. Yakub's theories or Dr. Master's teacher in 2024. Honestly, that stuff got left behind decades ago. It was dead when we arrived in the late 90s. Its NOT history, it is black therapy or Black politics. It is a knee-jerk reaction to White racism. Today we have all kinds of mutations of this era in African educational discovery. Meme and picture scholarship and the Africanizing of Tarzan and Shoguns in Japan on social media.
If in the 90s that stuff was scary to read, can you imagine reading it now? Some of the most ridiculous stuff you can imagine. But we don't like to lay into it too much because we give credit to those elders who opened the door in academia to a new understanding of history. As Alison Bailey noted. "In the Quest for certainty, White has believed in a colorless genderless account of events" (paraphrase) and this was possible because of Afrocentrism. So today when we speak of an African framework we are happy for the work that went before that broke that nonsense. BUT (and this is big) that in itself did not give us new knowledge if after that all you walk around and do is swap white for black.
Dr. Ben could get away with telling African Americans he was part Ethiopian and spoke Ge'ez if no one knew anything about Ethiopia.
Discussions back then were very low resolution. Very binary and that was a mirror of the data available to African people (namely African Americans) as well as the poor literacy of the general population. People struggling to love Africa had to be told Africa was great and full of something found in Europe. That need could only lead Afrocentrsim to be imprisoned by the same value structures of Eurocentrism. All Clarke or Ben or Williams had to say was "Europeans stole our history and the Greeks were educated in Egypt". They never went any deeper because they did not have to go any deeper. Decades later imagine how many of their followers are still at this low-resolution point. And today when this general rhetoric bucks up against serious archeological, genetic, and linguistic knowledge it falls to dust.
So we see these kinds of ridiculous misinformation paraded in 2024 as African history and "The truth". It is truth for the most intellectually poor amongst us. The person who just came from this meme:
The quality of their audience are the same people who clicked like on:
Its a lot of white liberals behind this rubbish. Because it is way easier to sell off the back of black controversy these days than off of merit. The very silly think this is what inclusion looks like. If we are interested in inclusion then include some real African stories from Ethiopia or Congo. or Candace Amanirenas of Meroe. This is not inclusion, this is another way to mock people and take them outside of history. What I am reading is Africans are so bankrupt when it comes to history that we have to appropriate the history of others.
Even the poor Olmecs are not safe. We had a black crusader traveling the globe claiming what others have done as part of original blackness. Skipping everything inside of Africa. So today everyone knows Wakanda and Black Moors, yet Sankore and Ancient Ghana are still hidden in the history books. They will tell you all about Black Japanese but nothing about when the Axumites took on the Empires of Persia or when Somalia was the hub of trade from Africa to Asia.
Two reactions when you are WOKEN up and forced to think again. Get angry or say WOW, I learned something let me go and learn more. Most get angry and here is why. What did we say about TOLERABLE TRUTH? Humans have no true investment in truth, we are invested in security, the security of the identity or notion of self that helps us cope/function in the world as we like to see it. And in that strange uniquely personal world we (the authors of our own reality) are always Good and heroic. Anything that shatters any aspect of that is seen as a THREAT, to be conquered. There is no need for logic, only emotions in dealing with that threat. Where the threat is uncomfortable truths.
Do you know what this guy was replying to? Because we said Cleopatra was not African but Greek.
We got the best person for the role
"I do not like what you are saying I will not unsubscribe from your page" -- Emotional reaction.
I could be discussing Zionist or Afrocentrics. And we understand it like we understand night and day. Imagine having everything invested into the Good Jew or the Good African. And then you have to look at Gaza or in the case of Africa you have to cope with Rwanda?
Your brain cannot reconcile between these two extremes of God's chosen people in the case of the Jewish example or bad Africans acting on their own agency in the example of Afrocentrism. And while they do not state explicitly what Afrocentrism, just like any ideology, is we are the good people. But when we do bad, it is someone else's fault. Muslims do it also. They excuse the bad as "not of the group" or "influenced by Western culture". Because in the minds of Muslims is this folklore about Islam = Peace. So how do Muslims reconcile these extremes? How do Christians reconcile the history of slavery with the teachings of Christianity? Apologize for it, get angry and go into denialism, or engage it honestly. The last option is only available to critical thinkers.
Nothing is innocent. You see your kids taking selfies day in day out it's a problem. It's very unhealthy. But what confuses us is this myth 'that everyone is doing it." No, you don't see high-achieving students at prestigious universities doing it. It's popular with a certain demographic. Very popular with the demographic making up the failed rates. Let us be clear I am talking about someone who 4 times a day, every day, 365 days a year non-stop with no other content beyond themselves. The only thing stopping them is running out of data or no Wifi. Added to this is all of these apps to clean up their "flaws" and present a false image of themselves to the audience that Facebook pushes to their page. Someone is profiting from it, just not us.
Lips puckered out like a duck and nothing else. How shallow do you have to be? I was going to put links to professional studies but a simple search of Google shows it is a massive social concern. And anyone can research that for themselves.
Photo of a South African girl who spent all her study time posting to social media, the following year she was out of school with a kid. She is semi-homeless and jobless. The girl in the main photo is wasting her parent's money at university and her main concern is selfies and likes. Every week her hair changes. The only content on her page is photos of her 4 -5 times a day.
Face smoothing to hide the "flaws"
I see kids at Columbia using their social media to fight Zionism, that is normal. I remember at uni fighting against apartheid, that is normal. Parents' generation was busy fighting Vietnam - that is normal. You can't be on the grades and on the selfies for likes at the same time. One parent told me 'modern times ' it's funny the definition of modern they sell to Blacks. Like freedom, they sell us the freedom that has kids in South Africa doing gender swap day.
Be warned someone other than us is profiting from this. All this rubbish which we are told is part of inclusion is the work of people who honestly do not care about us. We are tools in a broader agenda. Controversy for the sake of controversy. It is targeted to make some of us feel accomplished. All the phones that are flooding Africa are not being used to create a more educated or conscious African continent. Most of these people are not using the smartphone to gain more skills or a better understanding of the modern world or their history. It is there as part of our destruction.
The same tool that writes history can also write you out of history. The same tool that we use to empower can be used to confuse. This is the story of the tool and the tool user.
Stereotypes are never politically correct, but what has political correctness have to do with reality?
The stereotypes of the place below are 9/10 valid. So why ignore them as quick guides? But it is those quick guides that work 9/10 that also help to keep the world divided and at war. Because some stereotypes, when wrong, are deadly and dehumanizing. And that is the problem.
The stereotype of Muslims, Africans, Jews, etc has led to some pretty terrible problems. In South Africa that is xenophobia, in Rwanda it was genocide. Because the one problem with most stereotypes is when they cross over into informing people on how to deal with certain groups, and when that behavior becomes violent or oppressive. African Americans are heavy on the crime (true) and then the solution to that stereotype compounds the problem when it creates more institutional racism.
But many of us have this investment in political correctness while living up to every negative stereotype created to hold us back.
Because if I meet 100 women and 80% of them are like the photo above then how can we ignore the stereotype? What do the stats look like? And then we find out 99% of those stats apply to native people. I think it means something that cannot be ignored. 
FROM QUORA
Chloe Morgenstern-Heidler
Stereotypes exist for a reason. They were not formed in a mental vacuum, nor by any one person alone, but through multiple observations by many people of how the group being stereotyped, and individuals in that group, tend to behave in general.
Does that mean literally every individual in that group behaves that way? No, of course not; there are always exceptions. However, if there were no truth to stereotypes they would dissolve on their own. People would not need to crusade against them. The fact that people get uptight about them is proof there is some truth to them — people generally don’t get “butthurt” over things that are simply absurd.
The automatic assumption that stereotypes MUST be some sort of slanderous evil is false and irrational. They exist because they are useful generalizations about what one might encounter when interacting with the people who are said to embody them. My advice is this: if you don’t like the generalizations made about your group — whether that group is ethnic/racial, religious, hobbyist, or otherwise — go forth and deliberately be the exception, and encourage other members of your group to stop fulfilling that stereotype. Encourage them to give up the attitudes and behaviors that validate the stereotype. In time, if the majority of your group does that, the stereotype will get memory-holed.
If you’re acting in accordance with a negative stereotype, don’t blame others for noticing. Blame yourself for giving them something to notice.
Truth until you can bear no more. Because many of us have tolerable truth. The truth we are willing to accept and process but when it goes beyond we shut down and become anti-intellectual defensive and emotional. But as you grow in consciousness your truth threshold must increase to grow to another level. So people who would be making arguments from logic are now totally illogical when the information goes against beliefs critical to their notion of self. We see it a lot with religious people, but not only religious people. Emotive people who only have an emotional relationship with history suffer the most. They think you (the one sharing the information are corrupt) but you are just passing on age-old information. The fact that they did not know is not your business. How can you be anti-African for discussing historical facts? What happens when beliefs critical to who you are, are shaken? What is your cut-off before the illogical emotive defenses go up? No Sire, the truth does not set you free, it sends you crazy!! This is why truth comes in doses, you would kill a person if you gave them a full shot of truth. You have to condition their body to be receptive to truth, like building up their immune system. And each person is different; some can handle one type of truth, while others cannot. Ultimately the human brain was never designed to cope with unfiltered truths. We would be totally dysfunctional.
BACKGROUND
We previously wrote about this on Patreon. But I had a debate on something quite factual with a friend who was totally not prepared to deal with the truth he did not know. There is no volume of facts you could present to him to make him accept what is impossible to deny. Might as well deny the Sun is hot. So I did not bother with references because he would just say "Each to his own". The immaturity is a sign of a mind that is not truly conscious beyond what makes them feel good. They are not ready. When you cannot even accept basic facts, established history that no one debates then you are not ready.
EXAMPLE
Just imagine if God did not give a damn about us and our individual lives were meaningless. How would you feel waking up tomorrow? How would you feel knowing that love is just a chemical connection: nothing more nothing less Just chemicals in your head programmed like we program a Java Script to execute a function? And that is the truth. We are designed to love our kids because they carry on our genetic legacy. But all of this sits on a connection, and the connection can be strengthened and weakened. It is not what romantics would call true unconditional love. There is no such thing. This is why much of human culture is preoccupied with keeping the connections alive.
Now I could be totally wrong. But only an intellectual response can prove that.
When we discuss real-world issues in the real world the response requires solutions and focused discussions. Rhetoric might capture a popular thought-terminating cliche or a general political outlook but it offers us nothing. The crisis of leadership does not need someone to say "We need to start with the youth". or "We must create our own African institutions" . What can educated workers do with that-- we know/knew that 50 years ago. What specific can be added to the conversation about educating African children for a life of African excellence? The specifics not the lyrics from a Bob Marley song.
We do not need 1000 examples, just how to identify the uselessness of rhetoric at the serious discussion table when our mission is very specific and problems need to be solved. Too many decades have been wasted invested in this nonsense. African politicians have been supplementing good work with good talk because the masses have been conditioned to cheer good soundbites over good practical solutions.
So less about the system of the oppressor or other nefarious illumaniti-type forces: What can we do right now to change the situation in front of us? Material solutions to material problems.
Gaza, like Rwanda before is a turning point in my personal realization about the condition of the historical human being. It is very deep, and Gaza exposed something about human beings that could never be put back in the box-- it can never be unlearned, or denied. There are international laws and humanitarian codes--but only for some and only when it profit power. So if after all of our evolution, we are still like this.. After WW2 and the conventions on what is civilized and what is not we are still here like Medieval knights then what new humanity will we have in the future? What will have to happen? Because our technology has evolved so much, but our humanity is still Sword and Sandals.
In Gaza there is a square named after Nelson Mandela, in Israel there is one named after Balfour
While Arab Muslim leaders shoot down attacks on Israel and Clinton, Sunak, Biden, and World Kitchen worry about White lives there is another side of this story. Yes, it happened before Darfur, Congo, Ethiopia, and Rwanda but now we have it in 4K and live.
There is a trend running around that says "Worry about yourself". Educated and conscious people do not need to even really read this post. Honestly, because who talks like that? What mature-minded global person--even if selfish--understands the world in such isolated terms? Which country on Earth does not have ambassadors and global trade and international relationships? Okay so clearly the world beyond our nose is of concern. But still, amongst the lower intellect, we are told "Africa should worry about Africa". As if there is a conflict between Pan-Africanism and the broader world. Actually, Pan-Africanism means an engagement in the broader world. What does "Pan" mean? (Pan-, a prefix meaning "all", "of everything", or "involving all members" of a group). Pan-African concerns are naturally global.
When we worry about ourselves do you know what world we create? A world where Barbados worries about Barbados but not Haiti, where South Africa worries about South Africa but not Congo. Where Ethiopia worries about Ethiopia but not Somalia or Sudan. Where people in KZN worry about KZN but not Eastern Cape. At some point, any humanity we thought we were building is lost. Because why stop there? If the Hausas are suffering and I am Yourba why should I worry about them? But let me drive the nail home. When the Ewe were being slaved across the Atlantic why worry about them, I am not Ewe I am Asante. Why worry about Tutsi during the genocide, I am Hutu. Do you see where 'worry about yourself' lands us? Had someone not African not been bothered about slavery slavery would have gone on much longer. Had someone, not South African, like the Palestinians and others not taken issue with Apartheid it would probably still be running. Only savage monsters don't worry about the suffering of others. Busy with the football score while children starve. So no more "We are the World" because we should only worry about ourselves.
The very same people who are on YouTube talking about Gaza are interestingly enough the same people who are talking about Sudan, and Congo. These are conscious human beings and they come in all colors, religions and nationalities. Yet the people who are saying "Black people should only worry about Africa" are on social media with memes, jokes, lude sexual posts, AI factories, Rihanna birthday greetings, And P-Diddy gay sex recordings. But these slimy dogs will use Congo for virtue signaling. Yet nothing on their social accounts shows any interest in Congo beyond using it to call out pro-Palestinian Africans (which is 98% of Africa). Not one of them would buy a book on Congo or donate money to Friends of Congo. None of them can find Darfur on a map. These are the Wretched of the Earth and they come in all colors, all nationalities and all religions.
A friend ask me to comment on a video titled do North Africans look down on Black (sic) Africans? I will be snobby and say if you watching that race-baiting nonsense someone is playing you. How about the video called do Ethiopians look down on Black Africans? Or do Africans look down on African Americans, do Greeks look down on Italians, Koreans on Chinese, Germans on Turks, Turks at Arabs? Are Xhosa looking down on Zulus? Do Lebanese not look down on Palestinians along with Egyptians, Syrians, and everyone Arab?
This is the paradigm shift. What is the conversation actually about? What is the purpose? I think it is useless clickbait. Nothing in a video like that is intellectual or academic. It serves no purpose. If the so-called Black African is at the bottom of every negative demographic would another group look up to them? Look up to them for what? Excellence in science? So what are we discussing?
Do the French look down on English, guys come out of this nonsense and come into deeper consciousness. What is there to respect? Missing dads, or lack of industry?
- Obtenir le lien
- X
- Autres applications
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire